docs(qfd): add quality function deployment design doc

Translates user-facing requirements (the WHATs) into engineering
functions (the HOWs) and components, with a House-of-Quality matrix,
roof tradeoffs, function→component mapping (anchored to ADRs), and a
critical performance budget keyed to upcoming spikes. Cross-references
adr.md throughout.
This commit is contained in:
Julien Calixte
2026-05-14 12:45:18 +02:00
parent 56c934e97e
commit 8fb8cce729

307
docs/qfd.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
# Quality Function Deployment
Translates what the device must *be* (user-facing requirements) into what it
must *do* (engineering functions) and what we must *build* (components).
Surfaces the few targets that dominate the design and the conflicts between
them. Every decision cell points back to [`adr.md`](adr.md).
Scope: v0.1 MVP, with the v0.2v1.0 trajectory ([README](../README.md)) in
mind so we don't paint into a corner.
Format inspired by the classic House of Quality, kept compact. Strength
weights: **9** strong, **3** medium, **1** weak, blank none.
---
## 1. Customer requirements (the WHATs)
What a user (= me) values about the device, with importance weights on a
110 scale. Source columns point at the doc the requirement comes from.
| ID | Requirement | Weight | Source |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------|:------:|-----------------------|
| W1 | Sub-second visible response to typing | 10 | product §UX, README |
| W2 | `Ctrl-G` reliably lands a commit on GitHub | 9 | product user story 4 |
| W3 | Pulling power never corrupts the file | 10 | product story 5, AC |
| W4 | One-shot first-run setup, never repeated | 7 | product story 1 |
| W5 | Quick boot to a writing cursor | 6 | product AC (≤ 5 s) |
| W6 | Long sessions without crash / lag / drift | 9 | product AC (1 h soak) |
| W7 | Distraction-free, single-purpose surface | 8 | README vision |
| W8 | E-ink-honest UI (no blink, no animation, no flash spam) | 7 | README §UX |
| W9 | Refactorable across nine downstream releases | 8 | README roadmap |
| W10 | Hackable / DIY-shaped BOM and code | 5 | README title |
| W11 | Multi-day battery life (v0.8 onward) | 4 | README v0.8 |
| W12 | Local-only file scope coexists with git scope (v0.5+) | 5 | README scopes |
---
## 2. Engineering functions (the HOWs)
Measurable characteristics. Targets are v0.1 unless noted. Direction column
shows what "better" looks like (↑ higher, ↓ lower, → fixed).
| ID | Function | Dir | v0.1 target | v1.0 target |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------|:---:|--------------------------|-----------------------|
| H1 | Keypress → glyph latency | ↓ | ≤ 200 ms | ≤ 150 ms |
| H2 | Partial-refresh region area per keystroke | ↓ | ≤ 1 text line (~22 px h) | same |
| H3 | Full-refresh cadence (clears ghosting) | → | 1 per 20 partials | tuned by panel temp |
| H4 | Cold boot → cursor ready | ↓ | ≤ 5 s | ≤ 3 s |
| H5 | Continuous-typing endurance (no drop, no leak) | ↑ | ≥ 1 h | ≥ 8 h |
| H6 | `Ctrl-G` push success rate on healthy Wi-Fi | ↑ | ≥ 95 % | ≥ 99 % |
| H7 | Push end-to-end (one-file commit) | ↓ | ≤ 30 s | ≤ 10 s |
| H8 | Save survives power loss after status confirms | → | 100 % | 100 % |
| H9 | PSRAM heap headroom during push | ↑ | ≥ 1 MB free at peak | same |
| H10 | Firmware binary size | ↓ | ≤ 2 MB | ≤ 1.5 MB |
| H11 | Stack budget across all tasks | ↓ | ≤ 80 KB (sum) | same |
| H12 | Wi-Fi reconnect on transient outage | ↓ | ≤ 30 s | ≤ 10 s |
| H13 | Idle / typing / push current draw | ↓ | measured only | sized for >2 days |
| H14 | Module count / public-API surface (refactor proxy) | → | ≤ 8 modules | same |
| H15 | Build time (clean, release) | ↓ | ≤ 10 min | ≤ 7 min |
---
## 3. House of Quality — WHATs × HOWs
Reading: row × column cell is how strongly the function (H) advances the
requirement (W). Importance at the bottom is `Σ(weight × strength)` — the
weighted vote on which functions deserve the most engineering attention.
| | H1 lat | H2 area | H3 cad | H4 boot | H5 soak | H6 push% | H7 push s | H8 dura | H9 heap | H10 bin | H11 stk | H12 wifi | H13 mA | H14 mod | H15 build |
|-------|:------:|:-------:|:------:|:-------:|:-------:|:--------:|:---------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|:--------:|:------:|:-------:|:---------:|
| W1 (10) | **9** | 9 | 3 | | 3 | | | | 1 | | 1 | | | | |
| W2 (9) | | | | | | **9** | 3 | | 9 | | | 9 | | | |
| W3 (10) | | | | | | | | **9** | | | | | | | |
| W4 (7) | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | 3 | | 1 | |
| W5 (6) | | | | **9** | | | | | | 3 | | | | | |
| W6 (9) | 3 | | 3 | | **9** | 3 | | 3 | 9 | | 3 | 3 | | | |
| W7 (8) | 3 | 3 | 3 | | | | | | | | | | 3 | 1 | |
| W8 (7) | 1 | 9 | **9** | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| W9 (8) | | | | | | | | | | 1 | 1 | | | **9** | 3 |
| W10 (5) | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| W11 (4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | **9** | | |
| W12 (5) | | | | | | 1 | | 3 | | | | | | 3 | |
| **Σ** | **138**| **174** | **126**| **54** | **108** | **132** | **27** | **147** | **162** | **38** | **41** | **120** | **74** | **115** | **29** |
### Top engineering priorities (from importance)
1. **H2 — partial-refresh region area** (174). Bound how many pixels the
panel has to flip per keypress; ADR-003 is the hardware-side answer.
2. **H9 — PSRAM heap during push** (162). gitoxide pack + rope + TLS all
share the same arena; ADR-001 and ADR-004 trade binary size for ecosystem
so this becomes the watched metric.
3. **H8 — save durability** (147). Atomic-rename + fsync; FAT's weakness is
acknowledged in ADR-007 and mitigated, not designed around.
4. **H1 — keypress latency** (138). The single most user-visible number;
ADR-002 and ADR-003 are co-conspirators.
5. **H6 — push success rate** (132). ADR-004 (gitoxide) and ADR-005 (PAT
over HTTPS) own this jointly; spike 7 is the kill-switch.
6. **H3 — full-refresh cadence** (126). The ghosting/flash tradeoff; lives
in the render layer.
The bottom three (H7 push time, H15 build time, H10 binary size) are real
costs but ones we knowingly took on (ADR-001) and are not in the critical
path of user experience.
---
## 4. Roof — function-vs-function tradeoffs
The roof shows where pushing one function pushes another the wrong way.
**`++`** strong reinforcement, **`+`** mild, **``** mild conflict,
**` `** strong conflict.
| | H1 | H2 | H3 | H4 | H5 | H6 | H7 | H8 | H9 | H10 | H11 | H12 | H13 | H14 | H15 |
|---------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----|
| **H1** | — | ++ | | | + | | | | | | | | | | |
| **H2** | | — | ++ | | | | | | | | | | + | | |
| **H3** | | | — | | | | | | | | | | + | | |
| **H4** | | | | — | | | | | | | | | | | |
| **H5** | | | | | — | + | | + | | | | | | | |
| **H6** | | | | | | — | + | | | | | ++ | | | |
| **H7** | | | | | | | — | | | | | ++ | | | |
| **H8** | | | | | | | | — | | | | | | | |
| **H9** | | | | | | | | | — | | | | | | |
| **H10** | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | | |
| **H11** | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | | |
| **H12** | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | | |
| **H13** | | | | | | | | | | | | | — | | |
| **H14** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — | |
| **H15** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | — |
### Conflicts that actually shape the design
- **H1 latency ↔ H3 refresh cadence** (mild). More partial refreshes per
second pile up ghosting faster, demanding earlier full refreshes —
visible flashes that hurt H8 perception and H1 burst behaviour. The
ADR-003 strip aspect is the structural answer: a small framebuffer makes
*both* cheaper, not one at the expense of the other. The runtime answer
is render §H3: schedule full refreshes on idle ≥ 1 s (v0.1 tech doc).
- **H9 heap ↔ H10 binary size** (strong). std + gitoxide + mbedtls inflate
both. We chose to spend on these (ADR-001, ADR-004) because 16 MB flash
and 8 MB PSRAM make them affordable; the kill-switch is spike 7. If
heap during push refuses to come under 1 MB free, ADR-004 flips to
libgit2-sys for v0.1.
- **H9 heap ↔ H5 soak** (strong). A long writing session grows the rope
and the glyph cache; pushing on top can OOM. Mitigation: 256 KB file cap
(v0.1 tech doc) + glyph cache eviction before push + watching the spike
in spike 7.
- **H6 push success ↔ H12 Wi-Fi reconnect** (reinforcing). Both come from
the same network stack; investing in reconnect backoff helps both.
- **H10 binary ↔ H15 build time** (strong). std builds are slow. Accepted
in ADR-001 — refactor leverage (H14) is the long-term payoff, not the
per-build seconds.
- **H4 boot ↔ H10 binary** (mild). Larger binary = slower flash load.
Affordable at our size class but worth watching as features land.
- **H11 stacks ↔ H13 current draw** (mild, future). Idle threads draw
little but never zero; a future light-sleep policy (v0.8) wants them
parked.
- **H14 modularity ↔ H15 build time** (mild). More small crates = more
link work. Boring vs valuable; we lean toward modularity.
---
## 5. Function → Component mapping (Phase 2)
Which subsystem owns the delivery of each function. Cells are which ADR
constrains the choice.
Components (with anchoring ADR):
| ID | Component | ADR |
|-----|----------------------------------------------|------------|
| C1 | ESP32-S3-N16R8 SoC | ADR-001, ADR-008 |
| C2 | `esp-idf-rs` (std) + ESP-IDF | ADR-001 |
| C3 | `std::thread` + `crossbeam-channel` | ADR-006 |
| C4 | PSRAM allocator wrapper | ADR-001 |
| C5 | GDEY0579T93 + DESPI-c579 panel | ADR-003 |
| C6 | `embedded-graphics` + e-paper driver | ADR-002, ADR-003 |
| C7 | Custom widget / dirty-rect layer | ADR-002 |
| C8 | `ropey` rope buffer | ADR-001 (ecosystem) |
| C9 | TinyUSB host (`esp-idf` bindings) | ADR-009 |
| C10 | FAT on microSD | ADR-007 |
| C11 | LittleFS on internal flash | ADR-007 |
| C12 | `gitoxide` (`gix-*`) | ADR-004 |
| C13 | mbedtls TLS (via ESP-IDF) | ADR-005 |
| C14 | HTTPS + GitHub PAT auth | ADR-005 |
| C15 | eFuse-derived encryption key | ADR-005, ADR-007 |
| C16 | USB-C wall PSU | ADR-008 |
Function-to-component matrix (9 strong / 3 medium / 1 weak):
| | C1 SoC | C2 std | C3 thr | C4 PSR | C5 EPD | C6 eg | C7 wid | C8 rope | C9 USB | C10 SD | C11 LFS | C12 gix | C13 TLS | C14 PAT | C15 efs | C16 PSU |
|-------|:------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|:------:|:-----:|:------:|:-------:|:------:|:------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|:-------:|
| H1 lat | 3 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 9 | | | | | | | |
| H2 area | | | | | 9 | 9 | 9 | | | | | | | | | |
| H3 cad | | | | | 9 | 3 | 9 | | | | | | | | | |
| H4 boot | 3 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | | | | | 9 | 3 | | | | | |
| H5 soak | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1 | | | 9 | 9 | 3 | | 3 | 3 | | | |
| H6 push% | | 3 | | | | | | | | | | 9 | 9 | 9 | | |
| H7 push s| | | 3 | 1 | | | | | | 3 | | 9 | 9 | | | |
| H8 dura | | 3 | | | | | | | | 9 | 9 | | | | | |
| H9 heap | 3 | 3 | | 9 | | | | 3 | | | | 9 | 9 | | | |
| H10 bin | | 9 | 1 | | | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | | | 9 | 3 | | | |
| H11 stk | | | 9 | | | | | | 3 | | | 3 | | | | |
| H12 wifi | 3 | 9 | | | | | | | | | | | 3 | | | |
| H13 mA | 9 | | 1 | | 9 | | | | 3 | 3 | | | | | | 9 |
| H14 mod | | 3 | 3 | | | 3 | 9 | 3 | | | | 9 | | | | |
| H15 build| | 9 | | | | | | | | | | 9 | 3 | | | |
### Read across, not down
- **C5/C6/C7** (panel + graphics + widget) are the single most leveraged
cluster — they own H1, H2, H3 (the top of the priority list). ADR-002
and ADR-003 are the ADRs to keep most honest as v0.x progresses.
- **C12** (`gitoxide`) is overloaded: H6, H7, H9, H10, H11, H14, H15 all
touch it. That's why ADR-004 includes a kill-switch (fall back to
`libgit2-sys` if spike 7 fails). It's also why H9 sits in the top three
priorities — `gitoxide`'s memory profile is the unknown.
- **C2** (std runtime) sits underneath almost everything, but it's the
*enabler* (H4 boot, H10 binary, H12 Wi-Fi) rather than the bottleneck.
Reversing ADR-001 would force re-deciding ADR-004, ADR-005, ADR-006,
ADR-007 all at once — they're a single decision in three drawers.
---
## 6. Critical performance budget
Pulled from §3 importance and §4 conflicts, in priority order. These are
the numbers spikes 27 must validate before integration starts.
| Rank | Function | Target | Watched on | If we miss it |
|------|----------------|----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| 1 | H2 region area | ≤ 1 line per keypress| spike 2 + spike 5 | Increase font size to shrink per-glyph dirty rect (ADR-003 consequence) |
| 2 | H9 PSRAM heap | ≥ 1 MB free at push peak | spike 7 | ADR-004 kill-switch → `libgit2-sys`; cap rope at 128 KB |
| 3 | H8 durability | 100 % survive power yank after status | bench HIL | Re-evaluate ADR-007 (move config to internal NVS only) |
| 4 | H1 latency | ≤ 200 ms keypress→glyph | spike 5 | Larger partial-refresh region; render multi-char bursts |
| 5 | H6 push % | ≥ 95 % on healthy Wi-Fi | spike 6 + spike 7 | TLS cipher trim; reconnect backoff tuning |
| 6 | H3 cadence | full every ~20 partials | spike 2 | Adjust per panel temperature; defer flash to idle ≥ 1 s |
| 7 | H4 boot | ≤ 5 s to cursor | integration smoke | Trim startup logging; lazy-mount SD after splash |
| 8 | H5 soak | 1 h no leak / no drop| 1 h bench soak | Glyph-cache eviction; PSRAM heap-fragmentation review |
The two not-in-MVP rows but already-shaped-by-design:
| — | H13 current | Measured only in v0.1 | bench multimeter | Cell sizing for v0.8 is data-driven, not spec-sheet |
| — | H11 stacks | Sum ≤ 80 KB | static analysis | Was off-by-2x in ADR-006 pre-fix — corrected in §7 |
---
## 7. Tradeoffs and their why, linked to ADRs
Plain-language summary of what we accepted in exchange for what.
| Tradeoff | Got | Paid | ADR |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------|
| std (esp-idf-rs) over no_std (esp-hal) | Heap, threads, VFS, mbedtls, gitoxide-compatible | +1 MB binary, +510 min builds | ADR-001 |
| Custom widget layer over Ratatui | Dirty-rects aligned to e-ink regions; 200 KB binary back | 500 LoC we own and maintain | ADR-002 |
| 5.79" strip panel over 7.5" page or 10.3" reader | 27 KB framebuffer, fast partial refresh, "Freewrite" UX | Only ~11 visible lines | ADR-003 |
| `gitoxide` over `libgit2-sys` | Pure Rust, modular, no FFI cross-compile pain | Smart-HTTP path is newer; PSRAM profile unproven (spike 7) | ADR-004 |
| HTTPS + PAT over OAuth device-flow or SSH | First-run UX fits in a captive-portal form | Long-lived secret on device; manual rotation in v0.1 | ADR-005 |
| `std::thread` over `embassy` or `tokio` | Boring, debuggable, real stack traces; no exec to tune | ~76 KB total stack across 5 tasks | ADR-006 |
| FAT-on-SD + LittleFS-on-flash split | Desktop can read SD; config survives SD reformat | Two filesystems to manage; FAT's power-loss weakness mitigated by atomic-rename | ADR-007 |
| Wall power for v0.1, battery deferred | Measure real draw before sizing the cell | Tethered MVP; not the final aesthetic | ADR-008 |
| USB host (TinyUSB) over BLE-HID | No radio contention with Wi-Fi during push; keyboard powered from the device | One more USB connector on enclosure | ADR-009 |
### Conflicts left explicitly *unresolved* by v0.1
These are the live tensions we are watching, not deciding harder:
- **ADR-004 vs H9.** If `gitoxide` cannot keep ≥ 1 MB PSRAM free at push
peak, we are committed to switching transports for v0.1, not absorbing
the OOM risk.
- **ADR-009 vs H6/H13.** If TinyUSB host turns out unstable (spike 4),
BLE-HID is the documented fallback — at the cost of Wi-Fi radio
contention during push (re-checking H6).
- **ADR-007 vs H8.** Power loss between FAT rename and dir flush yields
the previous saved version. We document this as expected behavior; it
becomes a real bug only if soak testing shows it triggering on routine
saves.
---
## 8. Inconsistencies spotted and fixed
- **ADR-006 stack figure.** ADR-006 previously said "~40 KB of stack space
for task stacks" — but the v0.1 technical design's task table
(`usb 8 + wifi 8 + ui 16 + render 12 + git 32`) sums to **76 KB**.
Updated ADR-006's Consequences section to reflect the actual budget and
cross-reference the tech doc. The 76 KB figure still fits comfortably
in the ESP32-S3's 512 KB internal SRAM, so no design change — just
documentation accuracy.
No other cross-doc contradictions found between `adr.md`, README, and the
v0.1 product/technical docs at the time of writing. The minor variance
between README's "~12 lines" and product/ADR-003's "~11 lines" of edit
area is within rounding for a 14 px glyph in a 240 px tall edit region
and is not load-bearing.
---
## How to keep this document honest
- When a new ADR lands, add its components to §5 and re-score any
function-row whose dominant component changed.
- When a spike returns numbers, update §6's "Target" or "Watched on"
columns — this is the doc that *should* feel out of date if measured
reality drifts from estimates.
- The WHATs change rarely; the HOWs change with each release; the
matrices are recomputed when either side changes.