Files
andon/docs/adr/0001-defects-are-about-the-board-not-project-work.md
Julien Calixte a304973af6 init
2026-05-27 21:54:20 +02:00

10 lines
916 B
Markdown

# A Defect is about the Board artifact, not the reporter's project work
An Andon system normally signals a problem in the *work* being done; a reader could reasonably assume a click on a Section classifies a project problem under a Lean category (and aggregates to "which practices are weakest"). We decided the opposite: a **Defect** is feedback about the **physical Board itself** — a Section that is confusing, out of date, redundant, or missing — because the Board is the product we are rolling out company-wide and we want to find its weak points (Dantotsu) before/while scaling it.
## Consequences
- A **Section** that accumulates Defects is a **Weak Point of the Board**, not of a delivery team.
- The dashboard's red-dot map ranks *Board sections*, not project practices.
- If we later want to capture project-level problems too, that is a *different* concept and should not be conflated with Defect.