From b0169690c4dd91e2940d9ff0bac0c1ad3f47ec73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Calixte Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 14:38:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(quality-house): drop reMarkable W1 to 2 after firsthand test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit reMarkable 2 with Type Folio tested less responsive than Freewrite Smart Typewriter (Sailfish). With Smart at 3, reMarkable drops one notch to 2. Total: reMarkable 42 → 41, now tied with Smart at 41. --- docs/quality-house.md | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/quality-house.md b/docs/quality-house.md index ea54719..e24d2b7 100644 --- a/docs/quality-house.md +++ b/docs/quality-house.md @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ market"), not as a fair head-to-head buyer's guide. % Pass 1: stash each score as a named coordinate so the profile lines % below can reuse it without recomputing. \foreach \r/\so/\st/\sf/\sg/\sh in {% - 1/4/3/4/5/3, + 1/4/2/4/5/3, 2/5/4/4/2/4, 3/4/4/2/2/2, 4/5/2/2/5/2, @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ hackable-Linux 3). | ID | WHAT (truncated) | Typoena | reM. | Frw.T | Frw.S | Pom. | Rationale (shortest defensible) | | --- | ----------------------------------------------- | :--: | :--: | :---: | :---: | :--: | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -| W1 | Sub-second response to typing | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | Typoena targets ≤200 ms; reMarkable e-ink laggy; both Freewrites post-Sailfish trimmed latency 40–100 % (Frw.T plausibly inside 200 ms; Frw.S still trails by one notch on larger panel); Pomera LCD ~zero. | +| W1 | Sub-second response to typing | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | Typoena targets ≤200 ms; reMarkable e-ink visibly laggy — tested less responsive than Smart Typewriter; both Freewrites post-Sailfish trimmed latency 40–100 % (Frw.T plausibly inside 200 ms; Frw.S still trails by one notch on larger panel); Pomera LCD ~zero. | | W2 | Publishing is one deliberate action away | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | Ctrl-G atomic; reMarkable + Freewrite cloud-sync is one-tap but not git; Pomera = USB/SD copy or QR transfer. | | W3 | Pulling power never corrupts the file | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Typoena: atomic-rename + fsync. reMarkable journals. Freewrite + Pomera: forum reports of corruption on yank. | | W4 | Provisioning never interrupts writing | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Typoena v0.1: build-time config (dev-only). reM/Frw need Wi-Fi + account. Pomera: literally none. | @@ -599,11 +599,12 @@ hackable-Linux 3). | W13 | Typography sets a writing-tool tone | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Typoena v0.1: single mono (serif option in v1.0). reMarkable: rich type rendering. Freewrite + Pomera: utilitarian. | **Totals** (sum across 13 WHATs, no weighting): Typoena 50, Pomera 45, -Freewrite Traveler 42, reMarkable 42 (tied after Sailfish — pre-Sailfish -Traveler totalled 39), Freewrite Smart Typewriter 41 (pre-Sailfish 38). -Pomera still ranking second is the useful signal — we're effectively -building "Pomera + Wi-Fi + git + hackable BOM", which re-confirms the -differentiation thesis from `README.md`. +Freewrite Traveler 42, reMarkable 41, Freewrite Smart Typewriter 41 +(Traveler pre-Sailfish 39; Smart pre-Sailfish 38; reMarkable W1 dropped +3→2 after author's firsthand test). Pomera still ranking second is the +useful signal — we're effectively building "Pomera + Wi-Fi + git + +hackable BOM", which re-confirms the differentiation thesis from +`README.md`. Weighted totals (Σ score × W weight) tell the same story with more contrast — left as exercise; the unweighted view is enough to read the