docs: trim AI writing tells from READMEs and docs prose
Drop magic adverbs (silently, arguably), a stakes-inflation flourish, and the bold-first Snippets bullets; de-duplicate the "usable artifact, not a checkpoint" line shared by the README and roadmap.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ runs **SD-only** (see "EPD bus lock" below).
|
||||
against marginal signal integrity.
|
||||
3. Verified the card on the Mac: `Windows_FAT_32 TYPOENA`, 33.6 GB partition on
|
||||
a 133 GB card, **healthy and readable**. Rules out a dead card / wrong FS.
|
||||
4. Read the esp-idf SD init source: the CMD8 handler *silently tolerates* the
|
||||
4. Read the esp-idf SD init source: the CMD8 handler *tolerates* the
|
||||
same `ESP_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED` (treats it as "not a v2 card"), while CMD59's
|
||||
does not. So the failure might be a persistent bad response, not a CMD59
|
||||
one-off — needed the raw R1 bytes to tell.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Implementation notes that carry into the real module:
|
||||
|
||||
## What it does *not* prove — the next gate
|
||||
|
||||
The risk moved **with** the kill-switch, and arguably got harder. ADR-004 chose
|
||||
The risk moved **with** the kill-switch and got harder. ADR-004 chose
|
||||
gix *specifically to avoid* libgit2's C cross-compile to xtensa; falling back to
|
||||
libgit2 re-introduces exactly that. The open question is now:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user