perf(sync): instrument and benchmark commit-staging latency

Break the stage+commit window into sub-phases (FAT working-tree walk vs
object writes) via `commit split —` log lines, and add two micro-benchmarks
(sd_bench for SD/FAT primitive ops, git_bench for libgit2 object overhead)
with justfile recipes. Documents the walk-vs-writes cost model in
tradeoff-curves/sync-commit-staging.md to decide whether explicit-path
staging over the editor's dirty set is worth replacing add_all(["*"]).

docs/tradeoff-curves/README.md

@@ -11,3 +11,4 @@
 | --- | --- |
 | [`wifi-auto-sync.md`](wifi-auto-sync.md) | `auto_sync` interval vs Wi-Fi energy (a `1/T` hyperbola) — why the default is 10 min and opportunistic, not a wall-clock timer. |
 | [`epd-refresh-latency.md`](epd-refresh-latency.md) | E-ink refresh latency vs rows driven — the full / full-area-partial / windowed-Y cost model behind typing responsiveness and the boot splash→editor swap. |
+| [`sync-commit-staging.md`](sync-commit-staging.md) | Commit-staging strategy vs working-tree size — `add_all(["*"])` (O(tree) FAT walk) vs explicit-path (O(churn)); the walk-vs-writes split that decides whether explicit staging is worth it. |