prune: remove cycle time (as I guess it's not even the right computation)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ const feature: Feature = {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const simulationStore = useSimulationStore()
|
||||
const leadTimeDelta = computed(() =>
|
||||
(
|
||||
const leadTimeDeltaFloat = computed(
|
||||
() =>
|
||||
parseFloat(simulationStore.meanLeadTime('push')) -
|
||||
parseFloat(simulationStore.meanLeadTime('pull'))
|
||||
).toFixed(2)
|
||||
)
|
||||
const leadTimeDelta = computed(() => leadTimeDeltaFloat.value.toFixed(2))
|
||||
|
||||
const SIMULATION_THRESHOLD = 20
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,9 +200,11 @@ const displaySimulationConclusion = computed(() => {
|
||||
the patterns we can identify?
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
In a primarly <PushSystemIcon /> push system, we see teams struggling
|
||||
and stuck reworking the same features again and again to finally having
|
||||
all features live all at once.
|
||||
In a primarly <PushSystemIcon /> push system, depending on your
|
||||
simulation. You can see teams going just fine. But when a problem
|
||||
occurs, it starts to snowball. We see teams struggling and reworking the
|
||||
same features again and again to finally having all features delivered
|
||||
all at once.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
In a primarly <PullSystemIcon /> pull system however, we see a smoother
|
||||
@@ -224,10 +226,9 @@ const displaySimulationConclusion = computed(() => {
|
||||
<div class="text">
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Okay, we generally see that the <PullSystemIcon /> pull system is a bit
|
||||
quicker, features are delivered sooner even if the cycle time is quite
|
||||
the same. The real difference seems to be on the number of issues. In a
|
||||
<PullSystemIcon /> pull system, teams are focus on a small number of
|
||||
feature helping them having less overburden.
|
||||
quicker, features are delivered sooner. The real difference seems to be
|
||||
on the number of issues. In a <PullSystemIcon /> pull system, teams are
|
||||
focus on a small number of feature helping them having less overburden.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>
|
||||
Now, what happens when we have a lot of projects to deliver? Are
|
||||
@@ -238,11 +239,12 @@ const displaySimulationConclusion = computed(() => {
|
||||
<SimulationControls type="multiple" class="above" />
|
||||
<div class="flow-multiple-simulation text">
|
||||
<p v-if="displaySimulationConclusion">
|
||||
Okay, now we're pretty sure! The cycle time - the time needed to
|
||||
complete one feature - is quite close actually. But as the quality issue
|
||||
increase in the push system, these defects and corrections pile up and
|
||||
generate at about <span class="numeric">{{ leadTimeDelta }}</span>
|
||||
days of difference.
|
||||
Okay, now we're pretty sure! As the quality issue increase in the
|
||||
<PushSystemIcon /> push system, these defects and corrections pile up
|
||||
and generate at about
|
||||
<span class="numeric">{{ leadTimeDelta }}</span>
|
||||
days of difference<template v-if="leadTimeDeltaFloat > 12">!!</template
|
||||
><template v-else>.</template>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p v-else>
|
||||
Waiting for at least {{ SIMULATION_THRESHOLD }} simulations...
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -45,13 +45,13 @@ const featureStore = useFeatureStore()
|
||||
days
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
<div class="card">
|
||||
<!-- <div class="card">
|
||||
Cycle time
|
||||
<div class="data">
|
||||
<span class="numeric">{{ featureStore.cycleTime }}</span>
|
||||
days
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
</div> -->
|
||||
<div class="card">
|
||||
Quality issues
|
||||
<div class="numeric">{{ featureStore.qualityIssues }}</div>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
|
||||
<script setup lang="ts">
|
||||
import PullSystemIcon from '@/icons/PullSystemIcon.vue'
|
||||
import PushSystemIcon from '@/icons/PushSystemIcon.vue'
|
||||
import type { Strategy } from '@/modules/pull-system/lean/strategy'
|
||||
import { useSimulationStore } from '@/modules/pull-system/simulation/simulation-store'
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -11,18 +13,26 @@ const strategies: Strategy[] = ['push', 'pull']
|
||||
|
||||
<template>
|
||||
<div class="simulation-dashboard">
|
||||
<h3>Dashboard</h3>
|
||||
<h4>
|
||||
{{ simulationStore.simulationsDone
|
||||
}}<span class="sub">/{{ simulationStore.requestedSimulation }}</span>
|
||||
simulations
|
||||
</h4>
|
||||
<h3>
|
||||
Dashboard
|
||||
<span class="simulation-count">
|
||||
{{ simulationStore.simulationsDone
|
||||
}}<span class="sub">/{{ simulationStore.requestedSimulation }}</span>
|
||||
simulations
|
||||
</span>
|
||||
</h3>
|
||||
<table>
|
||||
<thead>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<th></th>
|
||||
<th class="numeric">push</th>
|
||||
<th class="numeric">pull</th>
|
||||
<th class="numeric">
|
||||
<PushSystemIcon />
|
||||
push system
|
||||
</th>
|
||||
<th class="numeric">
|
||||
<PullSystemIcon />
|
||||
pull system
|
||||
</th>
|
||||
<!-- [dps]
|
||||
<th class="numeric">push with problem solving</th>
|
||||
<th class="numeric">pull with problem solving</th> -->
|
||||
@@ -41,12 +51,12 @@ const strategies: Strategy[] = ['push', 'pull']
|
||||
{{ simulationStore.meanLeadTime(strategy) }}
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<!-- <tr>
|
||||
<td>Cycle time</td>
|
||||
<td class="numeric" v-for="strategy in strategies" :key="strategy">
|
||||
{{ simulationStore.meanCycleTime(strategy) }}
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
</tr> -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td>Quality issues</td>
|
||||
<td class="numeric" v-for="strategy in strategies" :key="strategy">
|
||||
@@ -76,13 +86,13 @@ const strategies: Strategy[] = ['push', 'pull']
|
||||
.simulation-dashboard {
|
||||
color: var(--primary-color);
|
||||
width: 100%;
|
||||
|
||||
table {
|
||||
padding: 1rem;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.numeric {
|
||||
text-align: right;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.simulation-count {
|
||||
font-size: 14px;
|
||||
}
|
||||
</style>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user