julien/tps
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

article: better words

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Julien Calixte
2025-01-05 22:10:44 +01:00
parent cb96e41c77
commit ab2669b42e
5 changed files with 52 additions and 53 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

86
src/modules/pull-system/FlowArticle.vue
View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ const feature: Feature = {
</script>
<template>
<div class="flow-article">
<article class="flow-article">
<h1>Pull system</h1>
<!-- <h2>Ekiden (駅伝): long-distance running relay race</h2> -->
<div class="flow-intro text">
@@ -55,19 +55,16 @@ const feature: Feature = {
</p>
</div>
<SeparatorIcon />
<div class="flow-hypothesis">
<!-- <div class="flow-hypothesis">
We need some hypothesis to start with. Here are ours:
<ol>
<li>
The more feature done in parallel, the more it is difficult to focus
and it is more likely to introduce a defect.
</li>
<li>
it takes the same amount of time for each team to complete a task
<span class="meaning">same task time</span>
it takes the same amount of time for each team to complete a task.
</li>
</ol>
<!-- <p>Here our hypothesis:</p>
<p>Here our hypothesis:</p>
<ol>
<li>
it takes the same amount of time for each team to complete a task
@@ -84,14 +81,14 @@ const feature: Feature = {
</li>
<li>release team never fails</li>
<li>there is no limit on how many defects a feature can have.</li>
</ol> -->
</div>
</ol>
</div> -->
<!-- <SeparatorIcon /> -->
<div class="flow-setup text">
<p>
The project who has just started, our goal is to make a product as fast
as you can. With you, you'll have the product team, designers,
developers and a release team.
The project has just started, our goal is to make a product as fast as
you can. You'll have teams dedicated to the product, the design, the
coding and one making sure it is going live.
</p>
<p>
First things first, what is a feature? A feature is a piece of software
@@ -105,11 +102,12 @@ const feature: Feature = {
It starts with the intention "<code>{{ feature.name }}</code
>". This is what we'll add to the mobile app.
</p>
<!-- [complexity]
<p>
<span class="numeric">({{ feature.complexity }})</span> is the
complexity of the feature. The more complex a feature is, the more
chance we introduce a defect.
</p>
</p> -->
<p>
<span class="numeric">{{ feature.leadTime }}d</span> is the number of
days the teams work on the feature. The goal is to reduce this number
@@ -117,7 +115,7 @@ const feature: Feature = {
</p>
<p>
<QualityIssue class="inline" :quality-issue="feature.qualityIssue" />
are the number of defects the feature had during the flow. For the sake
are the number of defects the feature has during the flow. For the sake
of simplicity, we assume teams are capable of detecting every defects
and we never deliver defects.
</p>
@@ -128,18 +126,11 @@ const feature: Feature = {
<!-- [dps] <p>Each day, you can choose between 3 strategies:</p> -->
<p>Each day, you can choose between 2 strategies:</p>
<ol>
<li>
<PushSystemIcon />
Push system
</li>
<li>
<PullSystemIcon />
Pull system
</li>
<li><PushSystemIcon /> Push system</li>
<li><PullSystemIcon /> Pull system</li>
<!-- [dps]
<li>
<ProblemSolvingIcon />
Problem solving
<ProblemSolvingIcon /> Problem solving
</li> -->
</ol>
<p>
@@ -153,6 +144,10 @@ const feature: Feature = {
by teams on the product. This way, no money is wasted, everyone has
everytime something to do.
</p>
<p>
But it comes with a cost: the more feature ongoing in parallel, the more
it is difficult to focus and it is more likely to introduce a defect..
</p>
<h3>
The pull system: produce features only when the next team needs it
</h3>
@@ -181,16 +176,14 @@ const feature: Feature = {
</div>
<FlowDashboard class="above" />
<FeatureSteps alias="playground" />
<SimulationControls type="single" class="above" />
<SimulationDashboard />
<div class="flow-single-simulation text">
<div class="manual-simulation text">
<!-- TODO: Mettre ici le comportement en pull system et en push system.
En push system, on voit un goulot d'étranglement.
En pull system, on voit petit à petit du danse avec une passation de plus en plus facile.
Il n'empêche que dans les deux systèmes il y ai de la création de défaut -->
<p>
Not so obvious... So what can we learn? What are the patterns we can
identify?
So what do you think? Not so obvious... So what can we learn? What are
the patterns we can identify?
</p>
<p>
In a primarly <PushSystemIcon /> push system, we see teams struggling
@@ -201,13 +194,20 @@ const feature: Feature = {
In a primarly <PullSystemIcon /> pull system however, we see a smoother
flow of work with teams able to pass on features more easily and
continuously, leading to a more steady and predictable delivery. It's
not perfect, but you may have see a balai of features when teams work
and finish at the same time. 💃🏽
<!-- TODO complete this sentence -->
not perfect, defects are still there. But when we start to see
synchronisation, we can see a better quality too.
</p>
<p>
Before any conclusion, comparing two simulations is not enough. Let's be
more scientific here and let's generate 200 projects delivering the 20
Here are two buttons to simulate the same project with only one strategy
involved so we can compare.
</p>
</div>
<SimulationControls type="single" class="above" />
<SimulationDashboard />
<div class="text">
<p>
Pull systems seem better. But before any conclusion, comparing two
simulations is not enough. Let's generate 200 projects delivering the 20
features of the Newsletter app and see what happens.
</p>
</div>
@@ -215,8 +215,11 @@ const feature: Feature = {
<SimulationDashboard />
<div class="flow-multiple-simulation text">
<p>
Okay, now we're pretty sure! For a long time, I wanted a proof
<em>to trust the process</em>, that's the beauty of simulations. . It's
Okay, now we're pretty sure! The takt time is quite close actually. But
as the quality issue increase in the push system, these defects and
corrections pile up and generate at about 15 days of difference. For a
long time, I wanted a proof
<em>to trust the process</em>, that's the beauty of simulations. It's
quite impossible to convince people when we're in the middle of the
battle. If teams change every time, you are doomed to get this problem
over and over again.
@@ -225,10 +228,11 @@ const feature: Feature = {
Teams tend to underestimate how long a project will be. And how hard it
will be to work with others.
</p>
<!-- [dps]
<p>
Note that problem solving is always a good practice. The capacity of the
team to stop and think about how they work is critical.
</p>
</p> -->
<p>
If we're not in a good pace, we just have to try harder. Only once.
"Just in time" becomes "Just this time" many times. So teams
@@ -254,10 +258,10 @@ const feature: Feature = {
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"
href="https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.052303#:~:text=The%20%E2%80%9Cfaster%2Dis%2Dslower,evacuation%20time%20can%20be%20achieved"
>faster is slower</a
>slower is faster</a
>
is counter-intuitive but it is a fact. The more we push the more we are
slowing down the system.
is counter-intuitive. The more we push the more we are slowing down the
system.
</p>
<p>
When money and pressure are in the game, fear, uncertainty, and doubt
@@ -280,7 +284,7 @@ const feature: Feature = {
This is the question of team work.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</article>
</template>
<style lang="scss">